Minisforum AtomMan Series has launched two 3A Gaming Mini PC, G7 Ti and G7 Pt. Many customers may be confused about the difference between them. Let us explore their differences together in this article.
Differences in Core Hardware Configuration
AtomMan G7 Ti
Intel® Core™ i9 14900HX
NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 4070 8G
DDR5 5600MHz, Max 96GB
AtomMan G7 Pt
AMD Ryzen™9 7945HX
AMD Radeon™ RX 7600M XT 8G
DDR5 5200MHz, Max 96GB
We tested the CPU-Z, R23, 3DMARK benchmark score data and the power consumption of Stress Test. Both models were tested in game mode. There are shortcut buttons on the side of both models to adjust the game/office mode, which is very convenient.
CPU-Z Test Results
As shown in the figure below, we can see that G7 Ti is stronger than G7 Pt in single-core performance, which means that in most single-core gaming scenarios, G7 Ti will perform better, which is also Intel's strength.
While thanks to the design of 16 large cores, G7 Pt is stronger than G7 Ti in multi-core performance, which means that G7 Pt will have more advantages in software that requires multi-core performance, such as design industry.
This is also proven in the R23's benchmark score.
3D MARK Test Results
In the 3D MARK Test, we tested the difference between the DX12 and DX11 of the G7 Ti's NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 4070 8G and the G7 Pt's AMD Radeon™ RX 7600M XT 8G, and there was no CPU bottleneck.
In the DX11-based Fire Strike benchmark, the scores of the two GPUs were very close. They are 28029 (NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 4070 8G) and 28178 (AMD Radeon™ RX 7600M XT 8G) respectively.
However, in the DX12-based Time Spy benchmark, the NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 4070 8G is nearly 20% stronger than the AMD Radeon™ RX 7600M XT 8G, which means that when most games in the future adopt DX12 technology, the frame rate of the GeForce RTX™ 4070 8G will be higher than that of the AMD Radeon™ RX 7600M XT 8G, and in DX11 games, this gap will be narrowed.
Power Consumption Test Results of Stress Test
In the Single Bake FPU Testing, the test results are shown in the figure below. After 15 minutes of testing, the i9 14900HX of the G7 Ti is stable at 90W and the temperature is maintained at 77°C, and the R9 7945HX of the G7 Pt is stable at 85W and the temperature is stable at 70°C. In terms of temperature control, both models perform quite well and the performance release is sufficient.
In the Double Bake Test, the G7 Pt needs to disable the 610M core graphics card, otherwise it will compete with the 7600MXT for power consumption. This needs to be noted. In the dual-baking environment, the power consumption of the G7 Ti is 55W+130W, the temperature is 75℃+84℃, and the power consumption of the G7 Pt is 85W+120W, the temperature is 85℃+74℃. From the performance release point of view, the CPU power consumption of the G7 Pt can be stabilized at 85W regardless of single or dual baking, and the performance release is very good.
We also tested the frame rate performance of Black Myth Wukong under the same image quality settings, using the game's own test tool, and the results are as follows.
Under the same 1080P high-quality settings, 100 rendering degrees, the test frame rate of G7 Ti is higher than that of G7 Pt, and we also tested the frame rate comparison of G7 Pt in FSR and TSR supersampling modes, and TSR is better than FSR.
In summary, both G7 Ti and G7 Pt can run Black Myth Wukong smoothly, and the overall performance of G7 Ti is better.